another yes vote in!

[Jon Ford]

>From: "telebob x" <telebob98@hotmail.com>
Folks-- Bob is being mean again and I feel so bad! However, since Bob says 
he "doesn't care"
about don being on the list or not, I'll take that as a "yes" to having him 
reinstated. So Mike, I've only had one "anti-reinstate so far. You'd better 
get some of your people out to the polls because right now only connie 
supports you, and she may be wavering since I explained to her that the 
issue is list-master abuse of power, not the color of the flag you wave.


>To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
>Subject: Re: Jon's panties in a wad
>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 22:38:47 +0000
>
>Mike-
>
>I wouldn't worry too much about Jon's blatherings.  He is usually in a room
>talking to himself anyway, since so few care to listen to his interminably
>wrought (up) perorations. Whether I stay or leave due to Don Laird is not 
>at
>issue. I don't really care, since Don is obviously dane braimaged.
>
>My actual problem is that I am boring myself silly listening to Jon's
>utterly predictable responses to almost everything. He is one of the most
>tedious humans I have had the displeasure of arguing with. I would rather
>listen to Andrea Dworkin on speed.
>
>I have allowed myself to be drawn into arguments where Jon pokes his
>tenditious cliches in my general direction. Frankly, I have lots of actual
>work to do.
>
>I am reminded of Gilbert's wonderful line spoken by the Masked Meanie many
>years ago.  "I swerved to hit a dog and ran into this tree."  I would 
>prefer
>to not hit a tree, so I am through swerving.
>
>Leave me on the list if you like, but I am heading for radio silence for a
>while.
>
>Best to you all,
>
>telecrank
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Jon Ford" <jonmfordster@hotmail.com>
>>To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
>>CC: dlaird1@austin.rr.com
>>Subject: Re: Don Laird de-listed? Yup.
>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:03:31 -0800
>>
>>Mike--This whole business is getting murkier-- I have seen no sign of
>>mental
>>instability in Laird, although he does send out some posts that are
>>controversial-- in fact, earlier Bob criticized you for kicking sand in
>>Laird's face. Perhaps Bob was talking about Roger or  Ewie or me (I have
>>been going him a tough time lately!). If Bob feels we are too unstable for
>>him, then perhaps he's the one who needs some therapy to shore up his weak
>>ego structure.If he feels he doesn't belong on the list, I would be glad 
>>to
>>see him depart as he seems to have turnedinto someone who wraps himself in
>>the flag a bit too tightly.But this seems actually to have little  to do
>>with Bob, in fact as  a mere "excuse" on your part to get rid of Laird, 
>>who
>>has been critical of
>>
>>very disgusted with your hypocrisy,
>>
>>Jon Ford
>>
>>>From: Michael Eisenstadt <michaele@ando.pair.com>
>>>To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
>>>Subject: Re: Don Laird de-listed? Yup.
>>>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:28:53 -0600
>>>
>>>Laird posted a message yesterday in which he
>>>spoke of the thousands of people murdered by
>>>the FBI and the ATF.
>>>
>>>I then got an email from Telebob as follows
>>>
>>>Mike-
>>>
>>>Can you unsubscribe me for a while.....I
>>>cannot take dealing with these idiots any longer.
>>>Their psychological problems preclude any rational
>>>discussion of the issues.  Frank Zappa was right.
>>>
>>>Bob Simmons
>>>
>>>So I unsubscribed Laird and convinced Telebob
>>>to stay. Telebob is ONE OF US, Laird is not
>>>and should not have been subscribed to a-g-l
>>>in the first place.
>>>
>>>Mike the List Manager
>>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>>
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp