response to the response to Mike Eisenstadt's critique

[Jim Strong]

Oui il est, le plus certainement. Peut-être Frances
n'a jamais eu une bicyclette telle qu'un petit enfant
- si elle avait jamais un ans???
----------------------------------------------------
I know even Jean-Pierre el Bufon Goethe-Grosse would
agree with your analysis Bubba.
----------------------------------------------------
Billy Jim


--- Wayne Johnson <cadaobh2@brgnet.com> wrote:
> C'est moi pataphysic, no?
> 
> B
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
> [mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]On
> Behalf Of Frances Morey
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 3:09 PM
> To: Wayne Johnson; Jon Ford;
> paramod@club-internet.fr;
> michaele@ando.pair.com
> Cc: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
> Subject: RE: response to the response to Mike
> Eisenstadt's critique
> 
> Okay, Wayne,
> I can well imagine a fish riding a bicycle, but a
> parrot? What gives?
> Frances
> 
> 
> 
> "The Skinny on Weight Loss: One Woman's
> True Journey to Fat and Back" by Frances Morey
> Order online
> or by phone at 1-888-795-4274 Extension #276
> 
> --- On Jan 22, 2002, Wayne Johnson wrote:
> > Well, Jonster...yuk, yuk...it takes one to know
> one.
> >
> >
> > Meanwhile, my bicycle has developed a parrot.
> >
> > B
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jon Ford [mailto:jonmfordster@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:06 AM
> > To: cadaobh2@brgnet.com; paramod@club-internet.fr;
> michaele@ando.pair.com
> > Cc: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
> > Subject: Re: response to the response to Mike
> Eisenstadt's critique
> >
> > Wayne-- this is an uncanny post-- it is as if you
> have penetrated the
> > deep
> > unconscious raving sub-mind of moronic Texans and
> other right-wing idiots
> > everywhere! And of course, Mike fits in there
> somewhere-- even though,
> > ironically, he is in some ways quite the
> francophile!
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > >From: "Wayne Johnson"
> > >To: "Joseph H. Rowe" ,
> > "Michael Eisenstadt"
> > >
> > >CC:
> > >Subject: response to the response to Mike
> Eisenstadt's critique
> > >Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:59:32 -0500
> > >
> > >Those Frenchified deGaullistas, fluer-de-lis
> yellow journalistic
> > >anti-American Papists are NOT to be trusted. Who
> can take any man
> > >seriously
> > >whose name is Honore or Pierre for that matter.
> Real men have at
> > least two
> > >MANLY names like Joe and Bob and Billy and Butch,
> not Jean-Paul or
> > Lucien
> > >or
> > >Auguste. What a bunch of poofs! Our British
> cousins no better and,
> > after
> > >many, many, many generations of warfare and
> intra-club breeding (when
> > not
> > >co-mingling with Germans) have come to think of
> the French as
> > "Foreigners"
> > >if not simply...frogs. Like who wants to read a
> > "newspaper" named for an
> > >Italian opera? You can't be serious.
> > >
> > >As we here in the Old Dominion well know, only
> the Rev. Moon's
> > Washington
> > >Times kind of newspaper can be trusted to tell
> the Truth and the
> > Whole
> > >Truth
> > >just like God and Jesus and Martin Luther and
> Father Coughlin and Pat
> > >Robertson intended it to be told. I mean, come
> on, can you have any
> > >respect
> > >for a culture that eats snails? Yukk. Real
> culture eat cattle
> > testicles
> > >and brains. How do think the Bush Family (in all
> there
> > Minionesqueness)
> > >got
> > >to be so darn smart? How do you think it was that
> Ken Lay was able to
> > fool
> > >all those people and run off with their money?
> Not from eating slugs
> > and
> > >snails, I'll tell you. Nosirree, these men ate
> VERTEBRATES and drank
> > beer
> > >(back before GWB found Jesus, he had found Bud &
> Coors & Lone
> > Star & Shiner
> > >& Falstaff and other REAL AMERICAN beers. No St.
> Pauli ale for
> > him.
> > >Nosir!) Only Frogs and
> >
>
>California-limp-wristed-quiche-sucking-commie-tree-huggers
> drink
> > wine.
> > >(Unless, of course, it is real
> German-American-Texican wine from New
> > >Braunsfels. Or Killeen. As in the treasured 1997
> vintage Chateau
> > du
> > >Goethe Gewurstramminer! )
> > >
> > >No sir. You are better off digging out your old
> Fulton Lewis Jr.
> > tapes and
> > >listening to them.
> > >
> > >Bubba
> > >
> > >(Life time subscriptions to the Star are
> available at really good
> > rates.
> > >There are still a couple of hundred issues with
> the Hubble photographs
> > of
> > >Heaven available at lowered cost to you, dear
> readers.)
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net
> > >[mailto:austin-ghetto-list-admin@pairlist.net]On
> Behalf Of Joseph H.
> > Rowe
> > >Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:51 AM
> > >To: Michael Eisenstadt
> > >Cc: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
> > >Subject: response to Mike Eisenstadt's critique
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >I wouldnt take what Joe Rowe forwarded very
> seriously. The
> > > >Figaro is not itself a very serious newspaper
> and the notion
> > > >that Osama would check in to the American
> Hospital in Dubai
> > > >for a procedure last summer beggars belief. At
> least my belief.
> > >
> > > >Mike Eisenstadt
> > >
> > > Mike, I'm not sure what your criteria for a
> > "serious:" newspaper
> > >are. Le Figaro is one of the top establishment
> dailies in France, and
> > >whether or not you agree with its politics (which
> I generally don't),
> > it is
> > >at least as "serious" a paper as any big American
> daily
> > owned by a giant
> > >media corporation. It has a highly professional
> staff of
> > international
> > >correspondents and reporters. Major writers have
> occasionally written
> > >articles for it, including Jean Paulhan, André
> Malraux, and others.
> > > Le Figaro can be criticized for many things, but
> it is
> > absolutely
> > >not a scandal-sheet or sensationalist tabloid, as
> you seem to
> > insinuate.
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
The peace of the cosmos is infinite motion

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/