The love that won't shut up
Dian Donnell
austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
Fri Mar 5 23:18:30 2004
maybe some of the good ones.
d
blacky@cbn.net.id wrote:
> My little contribution, from THIRD WORLD by E.A. Lacey (UT Grad student in
> Linguistics, early 1060s):
>
> On Definitions
>
> And if they ask you, are you straight or gay?
> Say "Boys, I'm stray."
>
> (Note: This is not a flower or tree, evidently - perhaps a fruit.)
>
> If you'd like a download of the book I edited of his travel poems I'll
> shoot you one.
> BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
>
> > Michael-- Please elucidate! Neither of your statements makes that much
> > sense
> > to me, although I could well imagine if one were raised in an environment
> > in
> > which everyone were doing straight sex and gay sex frequently and
> > alternatively, or only gay sex (as in a prison), then one might get
> > involved
> > with the action-- that's simple comformity to the social norm, a common
> > human trait!
> >
> > I'm not sure what that has to do with priests, however, who are in an
> > environment in which sex is verbotten, although they do have a lot of
> > control over vulnerable youth.
> >
> > Almost everyone has some opportunity for sex, but some people tend to seek
> > out such opportunities more so than others. These are the persons with a
> > larger "drive" for sex, be they gay or straight in their natural
> > orientation. Clearly people with a "gay" orientation will tend to place
> > themselves in situations where gay sex is possible, as will heterosexuals,
> > unless they are very repressed in their natural drive.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >>From: Michael Eisenstadt <michaele@ando.pair.com>
> >>Reply-To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
> >>To: austin-ghetto-list@pairlist.net
> >>Subject: oops!
> >>Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 17:12:09 -0600
> >>
> >>Frances,
> >>
> >>I just wrote:
> >>
> >>Not too surprisingly, one's degree of
> >>homosexuality is a function of opportunity,
> >>thus sailors, prisoners and priests have a
> >>higher Kinsey number than they would
> >>otherwise have had pari passu.
> >>
> >>I realize now that I meant to say:
> >>
> >>Not too surprisingly, one's degree of
> >>sexuality is a function of opportunity, thus
> >>sailors, prisoners and priests have a higher
> >>Kinsey homosexual number than they would
> >>otherwise have had pari passu.
> >>
> >>Mike
> >>
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Learn how to help protect your privacy and prevent fraud online at Tech
> > Hacks & Scams. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/techsafety.armx
> >
> >
> >