[AGL] carbon neutral 2
Harry Edwards
laughingwolf at ev1.net
Mon Jun 26 08:08:04 EDT 2006
this is one of the emails bounced yesterday. mebbe it'll get through
today. twisty
Some choices can be overwhelming. Two months after moving, Ms. Chafe is
still buying conventional power. "I'm trying to understand exactly
where my money is going before I make a decision," she said.
It can be even harder to sort through the many groups vying to shrink
your carbon footprint. Clif Bar, a company in Berkeley, Calif., that
sells energy bars, also sells $2 "Cool Tags" at concerts and sports
events to offset the cost of the drive; the money goes to NativeEnergy
for wind farms. Sites like Carbonfund.org and GreenTagsUSA.org have
carbon calculators to estimate pollution and offer products to offset
it. Ford Motor has a partnership with TerraPass to encourage drivers to
buy carbon offsets.
So many players have entered this market that consumers can shop
around. Ms. Pashby, the human resources manager in Baltimore who offset
her 14-ton carbon footprint for $57 through the Conservation Fund,
would have spent $200 through GreenTagsUSA.org, a Web site sponsored by
the Bonneville Environmental Foundation, a nonprofit group that
supports renewable energy, or $77 through Carbonfund.org, a nonprofit
organization that promotes ways to reduce or offset carbon emissions.
Although these vendors all seem to sell the same thing, the approaches
can vary. Some, like the Conservation Fund, plant trees to absorb
carbon. Others, like TerraPass and NativeEnergy, try to avoid pollution
in the first place by backing certain energy projects through green
tags and other methods. Some groups, like Carbonfund.org, try to do
both.
Ms. Pashby chose the Conservation Fund because "trees are better
looking than wind farms." But it's not clear which option is better for
the planet.
"The challenge for consumers is that there is no uniformly accepted
standard for what constitutes a valid reduction in global warming
pollution," said Daniel Lashof, science director of the climate center
of the Natural Resources Defense Council. The exceptions, he added, are
green tags carrying the Green-e certification, a seal of approval
issued by the Center for Resource Solutions, a nonprofit group based in
San Francisco that verifies that clean-power companies sell the amount
of power they say they do.
That label, however, is limited to green tags, and doesn't apply to
companies that sell a mix of projects. Those involving reforestation
can be especially difficult to verify.
"There's not a whole lot of great tracking for building forests in
Costa Rica," said Brendan Bell, associate Washington representative of
the Sierra Club's global warming and energy issues program. "How do you
know the same acre isn't being sold to a bunch of people?"
Some marketers are trying to improve accountability. The Conservation
Fund sends certificates to supporters, telling them when and where
their trees were planted. TerraPass has transactions verified by the
Center for Resource Solutions. And the Climate Neutral Network, an
independent nonprofit group in Portland, Ore., has developed a "Climate
Cool" certification for carbon offset products, though it has not been
widely adopted. The Center for Resource Solutions is also developing an
offset certification similar to Green-e that it hopes to introduce this
summer.
"We're trying to develop standards so we can make this transparent and
not have scandals that destroy the market," said Lars Kvale, an analyst
at the Center for Resource Solutions.
ACCOUNTABILITY may be especially important in the for-profit arena.
NativeEnergy, TerraPass and others profit by buying and then reselling
green tags and other investments.
"I was very surprised to hear later that TerraPass is a for-profit
company," Dr. Waters, the Sacramento doctor, said. "That may very well
have affected my decision to buy. I like to think that every nickel of
what I'm doing goes to support the cause."
TerraPass says that it tries to inform all customers about its
for-profit status, and that its business model has allowed it to
attract capital, grow faster and thus better serve the environment.
For now, at least, that is good enough for Dr. Waters. "It makes me
feel like I'm doing something, and it feels very personal," he said.
"I'd like to think that when it's time to renew, I'll comparison shop
and find the group that's most efficient."
More information about the Austin-ghetto-list
mailing list