[IETF-IDRM] Fwd: Re: [IDRM] DRM Taxonomy work -- drm framework...

[Thomas Hardjono]

>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:17:22 -0400
>From: Thomas Hardjono <thardjono@mediaone.net>
>Subject: Re: [IDRM] DRM Taxonomy work -- drm framework...
>X-Sender: thardjono@pop.ne.mediaone.net (Unverified)
>To: Jason Petrone <jpetrone@cnri.reston.va.us>, ietf-idrm@lists.elistx.com
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
>List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-idrm-help@lists.elistx.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:ietf-idrm@lists.elistx.com>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=subscribe>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.elistx.com/archives/ietf-idrm>
>List-Help: <http://lists.elistx.com/elists/admin_email.shtml>,
>  <mailto:ietf-idrm-request@lists.elistx.com?body=help>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Can you elaborate more on these 4 broad requirements from MPEG21?
>
>It would be useful, as there seems to be several DRM-related
>groups in different sectors of the Internet industry.
>
>The last two (management and protection) sounds interesting and
>relevant to IDRM.
>
>
>cheers,
>
>thomas
>------
>
>
>At 5/21/01||10:25 AM, Jason Petrone wrote:
>
>
>>The prerequisites for end-to-end DRM need to be defined.  MPEG-21 outlines
>>four broad requirements for DRM:
>>
>>Identification
>>Description
>>Management
>>Protection
>>
>>These sound right to me, though it still leaves the difficult task of 
>>defining
>>each in a general sense, and not just for motion pictures.
>>
>>Jason