[Jacob-list] Catching Rams
Linda
patchworkfibers at windstream.net
Thu Sep 17 16:06:22 EDT 2009
Good grief, Tara. You're making it sound like your way is the only way.
I don't condition score my sheep everyday. Why would they need to be
condition scored on a daily basis? I do go in with my ewes EVERY day
when I feed them. I don't handle each one, but I look at each one and
handle any that I think need it. Since I take excellent care of my
sheep, I don't expect them to lose a condition score overnight. It
certainly not stress my sheep for me to catch or handle them. When I
take them out back to pasture or anywhere, I just say "let's go sheep"
and they follow me. I caught 20 ewes this morning to check eyelids. No
injuries or stress to either the sheep or the shepherd. I don't catch my
rams every day or even every week. They are used to seeing me and have
been halter broken. It doesn't stress them out when I do catch them.
Your opinion is, of course, important and of interest.
But, you've never seen my sheep or my farm or me.
Linda
ranchrat wrote:
>
> From: Linda <patchworkfibers at windstream.net>
>
> I can live with that *smile* as it is ME and MY flock that determine
> if I am a "good" shepherd.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Linda
>
> ranchrat wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I do however have the right to state that part of being a good
>
> > shepherd is handling your stock every day, otherwise, you are not
>
> > going to find ME calling you a "good" shepherd. Just my long two
>
> > cents worth...
>
> >
>
> > Doggone,
>
> >
>
> > Tara Lee Higgins -- still working on the "good badge" in Good Shepherd
>
> > Rat Ranch, Alberta, Canada
>
> >
>
> Yes, that is exactly "it." What does it matter what my opinion is.
>
> My years working in a Conservation Office showed me examples of what
> happens to animals that are unable to cope with stress from only
> occasional handling. Stress is a fight or flight response and we all
> pretty much know that stress is a factor in many life limiting
> situations. When we received calls from the public asking why a bear
> was euthanized instead of relocated, several factors came into play.
> If it was a male bear, the CO's would be more likely not to attempt
> relocating the male as most territories were heavily populated with
> excessive males already. Females were usually accepted without
> negatives, so if it was a girl bear, relocation was a valid
> possibility. If the animal was compromised health wise (large worm
> load, injured, chased excessively before treeing, etc.) the stress of
> being sedated may mean the animal died, if not right off, possibly
> later due to over taxing their system. Repeat offenders, even tho it
> was the humans and garbage storage that usually was the cause of the
> initial trouble, the bear would not likely be relocated unless it was
> further away.
>
> I am striving to emulate ancient tribesmen that live with their
> flocks...not that I'll ever attain THAT goal. I like my "creature"
> comforts FAR too much...like hot and cold running water, soft bed sans
> sheep most times of the year, and MY house not being THEIR house...LOL
>
> Tara
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jacob-list mailing list, sponsored by Swallow Lane Farm & Fiberworks
> Jacob-list at jacobsheep.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/jacob-list
>
--
Patchwork Farm Jacob Sheep <http://www.patchworkfibers.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/jacob-list/attachments/20090917/01cf9495/attachment.html>
More information about the Jacob-list
mailing list