[Retros] Portoroz Codex meeting
Thomas Maeder
maeder at glue.ch
Fri Sep 13 11:51:24 EDT 2002
Am 2002.09.13 07:38 schrieb(en) Seth Breidbart:
>
> That would apply even if it weren't considered publication, since too
> many people would have seen it under the name of the sender, prior to
> "publication".
Morally yes.
As far as the PCCC is considered a legal authority, the Codex wording
also makes everything clear from a legal point of view.
--
Thomas
More information about the Retros
mailing list