[Retros] Imperfect 50-moves rule
liskov
liskov at im.bas-net.by
Wed Dec 3 05:40:22 EST 2003
Dear retro-friends,
Let me exhibit my recent problem, provocative by intention, which is
based on the treatment of the 50-moves rule by the current Codex for
Chess Composition.
Valery Liskovets
"Shakhm. Kompoz." No.54, 2003, #331
W: Kg7 Rg4 Pa7 Pb6 Pd2 Pd4 Pd6 Pf6 Pg5 Ph7
B: Ke8 Ra8 Rf8 Bh5 Sh8 Pb7 Pd7 Pf7 Pg6
+---a---b---c---d---e---f---g---h---+
| |
8 -R . . . -K -R . -S 8
| |
7 P -P . -P . -P K P 7
| |
6 . P . P . P -P . 6
| |
5 . . . . . . P -B 5
| |
4 . . . P . . R . 4
| |
3 . . . . . . . . 3
| |
2 . . . P . . . . 2
| |
1 . . . . . . . . 1
| |
+---a---b---c---d---e---f---g---h---+
#101 AP (pRA) Current Codex 10+9
AP after Keym (admitting AP-justified partial solutions along with
formal, maybe short, ones).
By the Piran Codex, the solution would be fifty moves shorter.
Valery Liskovets
More information about the Retros
mailing list