[Retros] Example 4 (better version of E.P.) Yefim 08/23/2004

[Francois Perruchaud]

> -----Message d'origine-----

> De : retros-admin at janko.at [mailto:retros-admin at janko.at] De 

> la part de Mario Richter

> Envoyé : mardi 24 août 2004 14:51

> À : retros at janko.at

> Objet : Re: [Retros] Example 4 (better version of E.P.) Yefim 

> 08/23/2004



> * Right to castle, but no possiblity to castle:

>   r3k3/8/8/3N4/8/8/8/7K w q - 0 0

>   white: Kh1 Nd5

>   black: Ke8 Ra8 

>   and black still having the right to castle:

> 

>   Is the position after 1.Nc7+ the same as after

>   1. ... Kd8 2.Nd5 Ke8 3.Nc7+?

>   (Kuhlmann says yes.)


Black doesn't have the right to castle here (Last move ?). So the position
IS obviously the same ;-).
A black unit should be added (that's what I did in my previous example).

François Perruchaud