Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [Retros] Two little SPG-challenges
Christoph Fieberg
christoph at fieberg.com
Mon Nov 29 16:28:10 EST 2004
I would opt for 2). And I could imagine that a powerful specific search
process for such retros is computable.
Here another attempt in 12.0 (Natch worked so far in vain):
Christoph Fieberg - SPG in 12.0 moves (9+11) - 29.11.2004 - C-
r1bqkbnr/pp4pp/8/8/8/8/3P1P1P/RNB1K1NR w KQkq - 0 13
Regards,
Christoph
>Chistoph wrote :
>What computer and what programme do you use? Natch (on 2 GHz, Pentium IV)
>is still "thinking".
>
>Hmmmm....
>I too was stunned when Mario cooked my problem, not by the fact that the
>problem was cooked, but that the cook was produced so quickly "with his
>computer".
>My estimation was that testing this problem would take monthes with actual
>programs and actual personal computers. Of course, with some luck, the
>cooks can appear at the begining of the resolution, but...
>My "retro-analysis" was then the following :
>1) either Mario has access to some super-computer in some university or
>enterprise; but he mentioned 350 MHz PII in one of his mails, what makes
>things still more suprising (I have 3GHz PIV)...
>2) either Mario has some surprise in reserve. The fact that he indicates
>that his problem A is "computer-generated" gives some hint...(at least
>that he has some programming ability...).
>
>Best,
> Michel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/retros/attachments/20041129/2a69b126/attachment.htm>
More information about the Retros
mailing list