[Retros] Codex of Chess Composition (was: 50 moves rule)
Otto Janko
otto at janko.at
Fri Dec 29 14:49:45 EST 2006
Thomas Maeder wrote:
> Nothing was changed in Wagningen. It was decided to postpone decisions to
> next year's meeting to allow delegates to consult with their countries'
> composers.
Thomas, unfortunately this does answer my question. When has the current
codex at http://www.sci.fi/~stniekat/pccc/codex.htm been approved, and which
was the codex before the current codex? And the codex before? Obviously,
there were codexes around since 1959:
> The Piran Codex was officially approved and came in
> force on the XXX FIDE Congress in Luxemburg, Sept. 1959.
Best Regards,
- Otto Janko [mailto:otto at janko.at] [http://www.janko.at]
-- Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security,
- will not have, nor do they deserve, either one." [Benjamin Franklin]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: retros-bounces at janko.at
> [mailto:retros-bounces at janko.at] On Behalf Of Thomas Maeder
> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 7:25 PM
> To: The Retrograde Analysis Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Retros] 50 moves rule
>
> Otto Janko wrote:
> >
> > For example, the current codex at
> >
> > http://www.sci.fi/~stniekat/pccc/codex.htm
> >
> > does not even have a publication date - the page "last
> updated" in February
> > 1999, but there is a chapter "Proposed amendments
> (Wageningen 2006)". When
> > has this codex agreed, and which codex was valid until then?
>
>
> Thomas Maeder wrote to this list (20.12.2006):
> >
> >> I found online a copy of the PCCC Codex, prior to the
> Wageningen meeting
> >> of this year:
> >>
> >> http://www.sci.fi/~stniekat/pccc/codex.htm#b22
> >>
> >> This contains various proposed amendments. Has anyone got
> a copy of the
> >> revised Codex agreed at Wageningen that they can circulate please?
> >
> > Nothing was changed in Wagningen. It was decided to
> postpone decisions to
> > next year's meeting to allow delegates to consult with
> their countries'
> > composers.
> >
> > The online text minus the "Proposed Amendments" part is the
> current Codex.
>
> --
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Retros mailing list
> Retros at janko.at
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros
More information about the Retros
mailing list