[Retros] A Q(sD)/0 problem

[Pascal Wassong]

And to answer my one question, here is what I found for case Q(sD)/0:

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

|*R |*S |*B |*Q |   |*B |*S |*R |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| . |*P |*P |   |*P |*P | . |*P |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

|   | . |*P | . |   | . |   | . |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| . |   | . |   | . |   | . |   |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

|*P | . |   | . |   | . |   | . |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| . |   | . |   | . |   | . |   |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| P | P |*K | P |   | P | P | P |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| R | S | B | Q | K | B | S | R |

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
rsbq1bsr/1pp1pp1p/2p5/8/p7/8/PPkP1PPP/RSBQKBSR
9.5 moves.	14 + 15


Pascal




>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Wassong <pascal.wassong at free.fr> writes:


    Pascal> Hello, I think that a case is missing: Q(sD)/0.  It seems
    Pascal> to me possible to mate the bK on c2, with wPc2 and e2
    Pascal> missing.