[Retros] Economy rules

[pastmaker at aol.com]

Good thinking, Joost!


-----Original Message-----
From: Joost de Heer <joost at sanguis.xs4all.nl>
To: The Retrograde Analysis Mailing List <retros at janko.at>
Sent: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 5:54 am
Subject: Re: [Retros] Economy rules




> Another point is that I would quite like to retain a lightness of touch in the?

> evaluation criteria for chess compositions, except in the domain of tasks?

> (where the criteria need to be spelled out explicitly).?

?
I was talking about a task problem. The position has 1 white king, one black king, 4 neutral pawns, and one extra piece to avoid a cook. This piece can be a white pawn or a black knight.?
?
I've solved the issue by sending both versions to the editor and let him choose which is the more economical :).?
?
Joost?
_______________________________________________?
Retros mailing list?
Retros at janko.at?
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros?


________________________________________________________________________
More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/text.htm?ncid=aolcmp00050000000003
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pairlist.net/pipermail/retros/attachments/20071204/18f8e97b/attachment.htm>