[Retros] quite *r*are, that is...
Noam Elkies
elkies at math.harvard.edu
Thu Jan 28 01:00:37 EST 2010
Oops -- I wrote:
> One can easily play badly enough to lose by Zugzwang even without
> any pressure from the opponent, e.g. 1 Nh3 2 Rg1?, which is
> quite are in ordinary chess. [...]
That is, quite *rare* (not "are").
NDE
More information about the Retros
mailing list