[Retros] Two-pawns chess

Nicolas Dupont Nicolas.Dupont at univ-lille1.fr
Fri Sep 14 14:33:19 EDT 2012



> For the sake of composition (in particular proofgames): Is threatening

> to capture the second pawn considered to be a check?


As far as the game is lost when a second pawn is captured, threatening
such a capture is actually the definition of a check, no ?



More information about the Retros mailing list