[Retros] Two-pawns chess
    Nicolas Dupont 
    Nicolas.Dupont at univ-lille1.fr
       
    Fri Sep 14 14:33:19 EDT 2012
    
    
  
> For the sake of composition (in particular proofgames): Is threatening
> to capture the second pawn considered to be a check?
As far as the game is lost when a second pawn is captured, threatening  
such a capture is actually the definition of a check, no ?
    
    
More information about the Retros
mailing list