[Retros] rstan
Francois Labelle
flab at wismuth.com
Wed Oct 2 10:24:39 EDT 2013
Every problem is sound according to my computer. Here are the solutions,
each with 2.0 moves added to the shortest line.
NDE2004:
1. e4 h5 2. Qxh5 g6 3. Qxg6 Nf6 4. Qxf6 e5 5. Qxe5+ Be7 6. Qxh8+ Bf8 7.
Qe5+ Be7 8. Qh8+ Bf8 9. Qe5+ Qe7 10. d3 d5 11. Kd2 Bg4 12. Kc3 Bh5 13.
Qxh5 Qb4#
Andrew1:
1. e3 f5 2. Qh5+ g6 3. Qxf5 e6 4. Qxe6+ Qe7 5. Qxg6+ Qf7 6. Qe6+ Qe7 7.
Qg6+ Qf7 8. Qe6+ Qxe6 9. Ke2 b5 10. Kd3 Qc4#
NDE:
1. e3 f6 2. Bd3 Kf7 3. Bg6+ Ke6 4. Bf5+ Kf7 5. Bg6+ Ke6 6. Bf5+ Ke5 7.
Bxd7 e6 8. Bxe6 Qxd2+ 9. Kf1 Qxd1#
Andrew2:
1. e3 d6 2. Ke2 Bg4+ 3. Kd3 Bf5+ 4. Ke2 Bg4+ 5. Kd3 Bf5+ 6. Ke2 Bg4+ 7.
Ke1 Qd7 8. Qxg4 Qb5 9. Qc8#
Andrew3:
1. d3 e6 2. Qd2 Ke7 3. Qg5+ Kd6 4. Qe5+ Ke7 5. Qg5+ Kd6 6. Qe5+ Kc6 7.
Bd2 Qg5 8. Bc3 Qc1#
François
On 10/01/2013 01:15 PM, Andrew Buchanan wrote:
> Minor error: the shortest line is 6.5 moves, because Bf5+ is required to
> eliminate the cook 1.e4.
>
> It's still faster the previous record, but faster still would be the
> following version:
>
> 1. d3 ... 2. Qd2 ... 3. Qg5+ ... 4. Qe5+ ...
> ...
> 4n+5. Bd2 ... 4n+6. Bc3 ...#
> (for n>=0)
>
> This will give a shortest line in 6.0 moves, and incidentally is
> capture-free.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Buchanan [mailto:andrew at anselan.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2013 00:27
> To: 'The Retrograde Analysis Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [Retros] rstan
>
> Or:
> 1. ... d6 2. ... Bg4+ 3. ... Bf5+ 4. ... Bg4+ then 1004. ... Bg4+ 1005. ...
> Qd7 1006. ... Qb5 1007. #
>
> The shortest line is just 4.5 moves.
>
> I don't think the term "half proof game" is right. Maybe "half synthetic
> game"?
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: retros-bounces at janko.at [mailto:retros-bounces at janko.at] On Behalf Of
> Noam Elkies
> Sent: 01 October 2013 13:02
> To: retros at janko.at
> Subject: Re: [Retros] rstan
>
> "Andrew Buchanan" <andrew at anselan.com> writes:
>
>> What fun!
>>
>> The question arises. What is the shortest infinite game? :)
> (-:
>
>> Here is a quick effort.
>>
>> 1.e3 ... 2.Qh5+ ... 3.Qxf5 ... 4.Qxe6+ ... 5.Qxg6+ ... 6.Qe6+ ... 7.Qg6+
> ...
>> and eventually something like
>> 1008.Qe6+ ... 1009.Ke2 ... 1010.Kd3 ...#
>>
>> Is it sound? Can it be improved?
> An attempted improvement:
>
> 1 e3 ... 2 Bd3 ... 3 Bg6+ ... 4 Bf5+ ... 5 Bg6+ ... 6 Bf5+ ...
> ...
> 1007 Bxd7 ... 1008 Bxe6 ... 1009 Kf1 ...#
>
> (the repetition actually starts at move 3, not 5)
>
> NDE
> _______________________________________________
> Retros mailing list
> Retros at janko.at
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros
>
> _______________________________________________
> Retros mailing list
> Retros at janko.at
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/retros
More information about the Retros
mailing list