[Retros] rights & ocassions / not answering Andrew anymore

[Joost de Heer]

On Thu, June 5, 2014 12:32, afretro wrote:
> In an article published almost a decade ago in
> feenschach, Kornilov and I noted that the limits of fairy chess had
> been expanded to such an extent (there are types in which there is no
> mate, like Losing Chess, etc) that it wouldN't come as a surprise if one
> day someone declared card games a form of fairy chess.

I once jokingly called draughts 'a form of fairy chess':

http://matplus.net/start.php?px=1401968888&app=forum&act=posts&fid=xshowf&tid=1036

Joost