[Retros] yefim offers a position to discuss

[Henrik Juel]

Hello Yefim

I believe that there is no way to prove that last move was e7-e5.

Best, Henrik

Den man. 27. nov. 2023 kl. 13.02 skrev Topsex.life via Retros <
retros at janko.at>:

> Dear members of retro-group!
>
> There is a problem I saw on FaceBook.
>
> 2Q5/P5p1/p1P3B1/pPpPpP2/kpN1NR2/1R6/3P4/K7 w - - 0 1
>
> Mate in 2.
>
> Somebody gave a solution 1.fe (en passant)
> but refused to write down a reason for this - a last move must be e7-e5.
>
> Is his answer true?
>
> Thank you, Yefim
> 11/27/2023
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Retros mailing list
> Retros at janko.at
> https://pairlist1.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/retros
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist1.pair.net/pipermail/retros/attachments/20231127/f1e461cc/attachment.htm>